Wolfie Kleti, whose real name is Charles Smith, rose to prominence on TikTok as an Arizona-based content creator known for disruptive pranks. Born in Phoenix in 2001, Kleti’s rise began in his late teens, with early videos often showing him targeting people in vulnerable situations. As of 2024, he is 23 years old and single, with no public record of any spouse or children. His estimated annual earnings fall between $18,000 and $22,000, with reported wealth under $100,000.
Kleti’s notoriety peaked following the controversial “poisoning food in Walmart” video, which brought widespread criticism and legal scrutiny. He remains a divisive figure online, with some profiles tracking his ongoing activities in the Southwest. Recent reports suggest he continues to create content, though with increased public and platform oversight. Readers looking for broader insights into internet personalities can explore detailed profiles and controversies in the TikTok influencer directory on InfluencersWiki.org.
Understanding the early life of Wolfie Kleti, also known as Charles Smith, sheds light on how he developed into the person he is today. Kleti’s background includes details on his real name, age, birthplace, family, and personal milestones leading up to his public notoriety on TikTok.
Wolfie Kleti was born Charles Smith in Phoenix, Arizona, in 2001. He chose “Wolfie Kleti” as a screen name when he started creating content as a teenager. As of 2024, his real age is 23 years old. This timeline matches the rise of TikTok as a platform for young content creators worldwide, as detailed in the history of TikTok.
Kleti’s birth in Phoenix marked the start of his journey. Local news and social media forums confirm his Arizona roots. He grew up in an urban part of Phoenix, which gave him early exposure to diverse communities and public spaces—settings often featured in his later videos. Public details on his family remain limited, as Kleti prefers to keep most of his relatives out of the spotlight.
There is no public record of any spouse or long-term partner for Charles Smith. He remains single in 2024. In all interviews and public appearances, he has not mentioned having any children. This has allowed him to focus fully on growing his online presence and brand identity.
Wolfie Kleti’s estimated annual earnings fall between $18,000 and $22,000, mostly from sponsorships, ad revenue, and occasional merchandise sales. His reported net wealth is under $100,000. These figures position him among the lower-income influencers on TikTok, especially when compared with top creators in the entertainment category of TikTok.
As of the most recent updates, Wolfie Kleti continues to live in the Phoenix area. He has not relocated, citing familiarity and access to key filming locations for his videos. Some of his recent content shows familiar Arizona landmarks. Ongoing public oversight and platform moderation have been noted in many recent reports, yet he remains active online.
| Detail | Information |
| ———————- | ———————————- |
| Real name | Charles Smith |
| Age | 23 (as of 2024) |
| Place of birth | Phoenix, Arizona |
| Marital status | Single |
| Children | None |
| Approximate earnings | $18,000 - $22,000 per year |
| Approximate wealth | Less than $100,000 |
| Latest known location | Phoenix, Arizona |
Kleti’s story reflects the growth of modern influencer culture on platforms like TikTok, as described in A Brief History Of TikTok And Its Rise To Popularity. His early environment and background shaped both the content he creates and the persona he adopts online.
Wolfie Kleti, known by his real name Charles Smith, built his TikTok persona around outrageous pranks and confrontational street antics. His content, which centers on causing public disruptions, has drawn widespread attention, both online and offline. As a 23-year-old Arizona native, Kleti’s actions and the resulting backlash have become a case study in the risks and ethics of influencer culture. This section dives into the specific incidents that propelled his fame, shaping how viewers and the public at large perceive him.
Kleti’s notoriety began as he started sharing videos designed to shock and provoke. His clips typically feature what many viewers consider aggressive pranking, with a focus on unsuspecting and often vulnerable members of the community—such as grocery store workers, elderly passersby, and those appearing distracted or disadvantaged in public spaces.
Key actions contributing to his reputation include:
These stunts generated heated discussions both on TikTok and other platforms. Many users condemned his disregard for personal boundaries and lack of empathy, while some defenders argued it was “just content.” Offline, store owners and citizens called for stronger legal response, reflecting increased frustration with the rise of disruptive internet personalities. The scope and scale of the backlash reveals a divide between digital notoriety and social responsibility, a subject explored in coverage about influencer controversies on TikTok.
Wolfie Kleti’s most infamous moment came when he uploaded a video showing himself pretending to poison food at a Walmart store in Phoenix. The act, intended to be a “prank,” involved tampering with packaged products while filming reactions from onlookers. The footage quickly went viral, resulting in widespread outrage and an immediate response from both law enforcement and the media.
Breaking down the incident:
The lasting effects were significant. His reputation as a troublemaker solidified, impacting both his online presence and real-world freedom. The incident raised important conversations about the limits of prank content and influencer accountability. For broader context on the trends and controversies shaping influencer actions, readers can consult major TikTok influencer controversies.
Kleti’s case remains a prime example of how internet notoriety, when mixed with reckless actions, can have real and lasting consequences—both for creators and the communities they affect.
Wolfie Kleti, known by his real name Charles Smith, has faced intense scrutiny due to his disruptive behavior on TikTok. The public’s reaction to his actions, especially following high-profile incidents, has influenced both his reputation and professional opportunities. The consequences extended beyond personal backlash, with tangible effects on his collaborations with other content creators and his standing in the influencer community.
The influencer community responded quickly and harshly to Kleti's brand of content. Prominent creators, especially those in the Top TikTok Channels, have spoken out against his approach. Many TikTok personalities emphasized the harm caused by targeting vulnerable people, stating that such tactics undermine the trust between creators and audiences.
Several established influencers issued public statements on their own channels. Some key reactions included:
The backlash affected Kleti's business prospects. Brands, worried about negative association, began to avoid sponsorship deals linked to his real name. Some collaborations with creators from the Top TikTok Channels were quietly dropped. The influencer community as a whole set a precedent by taking swift, collective action to protect its image.
These dynamics reflect broader trends in social media, where accountability is increasingly enforced by both audiences and peers. Legal risks and public image concerns are now routine for influencers, as detailed in guidance about legal risks of negative publicity. For more profiles on creators who have faced public fallout, readers can visit the Bad Influencers and Creators section.
Wolfie Kleti (Charles Smith) continues to hold a controversial place among Arizona-based influencers. As of 2024, his activities reflect both the aftermath of legal scrutiny and ongoing debates over influencer conduct. While his real name and age remain widely known, his online actions still generate public interest. This section breaks down Kleti’s present circumstances and considers the longer-term impact of his career, using current and factual information.
Kleti, still based in Phoenix, maintains a presence on TikTok and other platforms. However, monitoring of his accounts has increased. As reported in early 2024, TikTok’s community guidelines and local law enforcement watch his uploads more closely than before. Kleti manages his visibility by adjusting the tone and approach of his videos, sometimes shifting focus to commentary on pop culture and trends, rather than direct pranks.
Yet, the core of his persona—provocative and unpredictable—remains unchanged. He frequently addresses his controversial history and uses it as a point of engagement with followers. Earnings on a yearly basis have reportedly stalled, with his income falling between $18,000 and $22,000. His net wealth is under $100,000, which keeps him among the lesser-known earners on the platform. These financial realities reflect a pattern seen among other creators who face community backlash and loss of brand support.
For users seeking more profiles of contentious creators with similar patterns, the Bad Influencers and Creators section provides a broader perspective.
Wolfie Kleti’s name still sparks sharp conversations among TikTok communities, especially following discussions about influencer accountability. Many comment threads draw parallels between his controversies and those of other high-profile figures, like in the recent TikTok controversy involving Kate Mackz.
Offline, local businesses and citizens in Phoenix remain wary of his presence. Reports from store owners indicate that some shops actively discourage filming or ban known pranksters like Kleti. These community measures signal a shift in how towns handle disruptive content creators in public spaces.
He remains single, with no public record of a spouse or children. This aspect of his life gives him flexibility to respond to changing content trends and legal environments. His age, 23, places him among a cohort of young adults navigating the changing rules of influencer culture.
Wolfie Kleti’s legacy is closely tied to ongoing debates about the boundaries of prank content. The “poisoning food in Walmart” incident still shadows his brand. While he has not been banned from TikTok, his following is monitored, and ongoing policy changes—such as those discussed in recent analyses of the TikTok ban and its effects on creators—could further impact his ability to reach audiences.
Key takeaways from Kleti’s current status include:
For ongoing updates on his activities and for more comprehensive influencer profiles, refer to the TikTok influencer directory, which tracks both rising and controversial content creators.
Wolfie Kleti, known by his real name Charles Smith, stands as a prominent example of influencer controversy due to his high-profile pranks and legal troubles in Arizona. Born in Phoenix in 2001, Smith’s notoriety reached a peak in 2025 after he pleaded guilty to felony charges stemming from a pesticide prank that endangered public health at a Mesa Walmart. These actions not only shaped his reputation but also became a turning point in discussions about influencer accountability.
Smith’s real name and age, approximate yearly earnings, wealth, and current legal issues are now widely documented, reflecting the lasting impact of his conduct on digital platforms and in public records. His ongoing public and platform scrutiny signals a shift toward greater accountability for social media personalities, echoing broader calls for clearer ethical expectations and industry oversight.
For those interested in additional in-depth profiles of creators whose notoriety has sparked legal or public debate, the Bad Influencers and Creators section offers more case studies. Thank you for reading, and we invite you to share your thoughts on where influencer culture goes next as expectations for responsibility and public safety continue to evolve.